Apr 30 2007
Review Methodology
Food is one of our core focuses here at Japadamus. Restaurant reviews, in particular, are one of the reasons we started this site in the first place.
One of they problems I’ve noticed with online reviews, however, is methodology. You have various systems of stars and letter grades representing such a broad range of criteria that it’s really hard to make an apples to apples comparison of restaurants.
What I would like to do here is to define some sort of standardized reviewing methodology for this site. Hopefully this will make our reviews more useful for readers.
We also have three different authors for Japadamus, so ideally you will get to see the likes and dislikes of individual authors, providing additional review fidelity.
We use a grade-based reviewing system, because dealing with little clip art stars is annoying. There are four aspects of each restaurant that we will judge individually, and we will also provide an ‘overall’ grade for each restaurant we review.
-Food: This category will judge the quality of food. Simple as that. We’ll try to provide lots of detail here, since this is probably an important part of the review for most readers. At the same time, this is a highly subjective category, so get to know the likes/dislikes of your posters!
-Selection: This category will rate the selection of items offered by a restaurant. The importance of ’selection’ will vary depending on the restaurant - selection is probably more important at say, a sushi restaurant than a french place with a fixed menu.
-Service: Service is very subjective. On one hand, basic things like refilling water, food timing and menu knowledge are required for a ‘C’ grade. But servers must really be willing to go out of their way to make you happy in order to get a superior grade for service.
-Ambience: More important for some occasions than others, we will rate ambience, but depending on the restaurant, ambience may not play a big role in the ‘overall’ score. For example, a below average ambience score may not be a huge deal in a basic, home-style restaurant, but it will be more important in a chic trendy place.
-Overall: We don’t establish a weighing system to come up with the overall grade, since different criteria impact the overall impression of individual restaurants differently. Also, the value of a meal impacts the overall score - and when I say ‘value’ that means price comes into play here. Just think of the ‘overall’ grade as what we feel when we’re walking out the door.
Hopefully this grading methodology will provide you readers with a better understanding of how we feel about the restaurants we write about. As always, feel free to comment if you have questions.
One of the most interesting items was a 2 pack of “G Sake,” which claims to be “America’s most honored sake.” Produced by Sake One, a company I’ve never heard of, the G Sake bottle reminds me more of a cologne than a drink, but looks pretty slick nonetheless.
With
Mike Penner, a 23 year veteran sports columnist for LA Times
From Drudge. I’m not going to lie to you, I like Hugh Grant a lot. What I like best is the two Hugh Grant personalities. On one hand, you have the lovable, charming romantic comedy Hugh Grant that you see in movies like…well, every movie he’s ever done pretty much. And on the other, you have the arrested for soliciting a black prostitute Hugh Grant, looking disheveled and generally creepy in mug shots.
Following the release of Music and Lyrics, the lovable Hugh Grant let its other half take over for a bit. This time, we see the baked beans-throwing, reporter kicking Hugh Grant.
The Nene goose is a darling of the Hawaii media, any time something happens Nene related, The 